Bišu iela 14
- · Built 1900, 10 flats
Flats at Bišu iela 14 cost about 3,100 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (56 m²)
about €174,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Notary and state duty on selling a €174,000 flat: €2,681.87 →
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 8 sales in this building since 2024.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jan 2026 | 2 | 70 m² | 182,500 € | 2,603 |
| 27 Nov 2025 | 2 | 73 m² | 187,000 € | 2,576 |
| 4 Aug 2025 | 2 | 76 m² | 221,598 € | 2,908 |
| 15 Aug 2024 | 1 | 33 m² | 86,925 € | 2,658 |
| 27 May 2024 | 2 | 72 m² | 172,020 € | 2,376 |
| 27 May 2024 | 1 | 40 m² | 99,775 € | 2,507 |
| 28 Mar 2024 | 1 | 36 m² | 75,150 € | 2,105 |
| 14 Mar 2024 | 1 | 48 m² | 82,800 € | 1,736 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1900
- Energy class
- C
- Flats
- 10
- Living area
- 561 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 64 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1900–1909; 190) have a median of 104 kWh/m² — this one uses 38% less.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Bišu iela
Bišu iela 1 (20), Bišu iela 3 (1), Bišu iela 4 (1), Bišu iela 4A (1), Bišu iela 6 (25), Bišu iela 7 (17), Bišu iela 8 (1), Bišu iela 10 (1), Bišu iela 11 (8), Bišu iela 12 (9), Bišu iela 13 (22), Bišu iela 15 (1), Bišu iela 16 (18), Bišu iela 16A (14), Bišu iela 17 (30), Bišu iela 17A (23), Bišu iela 18 (1), Bišu iela 22 (10)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Bišu iela 14 was first used in 1900.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Bišu iela 14 has 10 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
64 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1900–1909; 190) have a median of 104 kWh/m² — this one uses 38% less.