Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 72A

  • · Built 1956, 16 flats

Flats at Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 72A cost about 1,545 €/m² per m² (November 2026).

What is your flat worth?

€

Average flat (56 m²)

about €86,000

the building's average flat size

Price per m²€1,545/m² · 897–€3,500/m² · from 15 comparable listings

Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.

Notary and state duty on selling a €86,000 flat: €1,361.87 →

© OpenStreetMapGoogle Maps ↗

Follow this building

An email when a flat in this building goes up for sale.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selling a flat at Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 72A? Find an estate agent →

Sale history

The State Land Service has registered 3 sales in this building since 2016.

DateFloorAreaPrice€/m²
26 Mar 2025260 m²85,000 €1,407
15 Jun 2023343 m²49,500 €1,148
19 May 2016160 m²48,000 €807

Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).

Building

Built
1956
Energy class
F
Flats
16
Living area
892 m²
Energy use and works done ▾

Energy use: 178 kWh/m² a year (2021 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1950–1959; 362) have a median of 108 kWh/m² — this one uses 65% more.

Flats in this building

No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.

    Other buildings on Čiekurkalna 1. līnija

    Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 1 (65), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 7 (4), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 7B (9), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 14 (11), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 20 (9), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 23A (8), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 41A (16), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 60 (9), Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 82 (5)

    Frequently asked questions

    When was the building built?

    According to the building register, Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 72A was first used in 1956.

    How many flats are in the building?

    According to the building register, Čiekurkalna 1. līnija 72A has 16 flats.

    How much energy does the building use?

    178 kWh/m² a year (2021 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1950–1959; 362) have a median of 108 kWh/m² — this one uses 65% more.