Dolomīta iela 2
- · Built 1970, 94 flats
Flats at Dolomīta iela 2 cost about 1,007 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (42 m²)
about €42,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 16 sales in this building since 2016.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026 | 3 | 36 m² | 29,000 € | 815 |
| 11 Jul 2025 | 2 | 37 m² | 19,500 € | 521 |
| 31 Oct 2024 | 3 | 48 m² | 39,000 € | 813 |
| 18 Oct 2024 | 1 | 31 m² | 18,600 € | 608 |
| 17 Oct 2024 | 4 | 50 m² | 26,000 € | 523 |
| 27 Aug 2024 | 4 | 36 m² | 17,000 € | 467 |
| 3 Aug 2023 | 5 | 50 m² | 30,000 € | 606 |
| 27 May 2022 | 4 | 34 m² | 17,000 € | 506 |
| 31 Mar 2022 | 3 | 51 m² | 34,500 € | 680 |
| 21 Sept 2021 | 2 | 36 m² | 12,000 € | 338 |
| 26 Oct 2020 | 5 | 33 m² | 26,000 € | 783 |
| 21 Nov 2018 | 5 | 38 m² | 18,000 € | 474 |
Show all 16 sales ▾
| 6 Aug 2018 | 3 | 38 m² | 18,800 € | 501 |
| 2 Jun 2017 | 5 | 52 m² | 29,000 € | 560 |
| 8 Dec 2016 | 4 | 51 m² | 32,000 € | 626 |
| 3 Oct 2016 | 4 | 50 m² | 22,000 € | 439 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1970
- Energy class
- F
- Flats
- 94
- Living area
- 3,929 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 135 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1970–1979; 727) have a median of 115 kWh/m² — this one uses 17% more.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Dolomīta iela
Dolomīta iela 4 (94)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Dolomīta iela 2 was first used in 1970.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Dolomīta iela 2 has 94 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
135 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1970–1979; 727) have a median of 115 kWh/m² — this one uses 17% more.