Firsa Sadovņikova iela 11
- · Built 1898, 19 flats
Flats at Firsa Sadovņikova iela 11 cost about 2,281 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (58 m²)
about €133,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Notary and state duty on selling a €133,000 flat: €2,066.87 →
Selling a flat at Firsa Sadovņikova iela 11? Find an estate agent →
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 5 sales in this building since 2021.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2025 | 3 | 83 m² | 115,000 € | 1,379 |
| 5 Feb 2025 | 1 | 35 m² | 20,000 € | 568 |
| 10 Mar 2022 | 5 | 51 m² | 68,000 € | 1,328 |
| 1 Jul 2021 | 5 | 51 m² | 29,800 € | 582 |
| 22 Jun 2021 | 4 | 44 m² | 55,500 € | 1,253 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1898
- Energy class
- F
- Flats
- 19
- Living area
- 1,106 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 150 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1890–1899; 85) have a median of 92 kWh/m² — this one uses 63% more.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Firsa Sadovņikova iela
Firsa Sadovņikova iela 17 (37), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 17A (22), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 21 (120), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 22 (18), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 22A (3), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 31 (22), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 31 (175), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 33 (14), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 39 (49), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 39A (37), Firsa Sadovņikova iela 43 (8)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Firsa Sadovņikova iela 11 was first used in 1898.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Firsa Sadovņikova iela 11 has 19 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
150 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1890–1899; 85) have a median of 92 kWh/m² — this one uses 63% more.