Jāņa Čakstes iela 5

  • · Built 1971, 40 flats

Flats at Jāņa Čakstes iela 5 cost about 1,970 €/m² per m² (November 2026).

What is your flat worth?

€

Average flat (62 m²)

about €121,000

the building's average flat size

Price per m²€1,970/m² · 1,005–€2,274/m² · from 10 comparable listings

Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.

Notary and state duty on selling a €121,000 flat: €1,886.87 →

© OpenStreetMapGoogle Maps ↗

Follow this building

An email when a flat in this building goes up for sale.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selling a flat at Jāņa Čakstes iela 5? Find an estate agent →

Sale history

The State Land Service has registered 10 sales in this building since 2017.

DateFloorAreaPrice€/m²
28 Jan 2026451 m²72,000 €1,406
9 Sept 2024252 m²75,600 €1,462
12 Jul 2023452 m²47,000 €911
10 Feb 2022251 m²61,500 €1,206
3 Feb 2021435 m²15,000 €425
27 Oct 2020335 m²26,500 €751
11 Feb 2020235 m²28,000 €793
24 Jul 2018151 m²35,000 €684
23 Aug 2017151 m²25,000 €491
15 Aug 2017451 m²35,000 €688

Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).

Building

Built
1971
Energy class
E
Flats
40
Living area
2,462 m²
Energy use and works done ▾

Energy use: 125 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Sigulda, built 1970–1979; 28) have a median of 66 kWh/m² — this one uses 89% more.

Flats in this building

No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.

    Other buildings on Jāņa Čakstes iela

    Jāņa Čakstes iela 1 (77), Jāņa Čakstes iela 3 (43), Jāņa Čakstes iela 9 (33), Jāņa Čakstes iela 11 (10)

    Frequently asked questions

    When was the building built?

    According to the building register, Jāņa Čakstes iela 5 was first used in 1971.

    How many flats are in the building?

    According to the building register, Jāņa Čakstes iela 5 has 40 flats.

    How much energy does the building use?

    125 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Sigulda, built 1970–1979; 28) have a median of 66 kWh/m² — this one uses 89% more.