Kandavas iela 8 k-4
- · Built 1961, 14 flats
Flats at Kandavas iela 8 k-4 cost about 1,767 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (41 m²)
about €72,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Notary and state duty on selling a €72,000 flat: €1,151.87 →
Selling a flat at Kandavas iela 8 k-4? Find an estate agent →
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 11 sales in this building since 2016.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 May 2026 | 3 | 43 m² | 48,900 € | 1,145 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | 1 | 42 m² | 52,500 € | 1,238 |
| 5 Nov 2024 | 1 | 49 m² | 33,500 € | 686 |
| 2 Sept 2024 | 2 | 49 m² | 45,000 € | 918 |
| 21 May 2024 | 3 | 44 m² | 43,000 € | 986 |
| 2 May 2023 | 3 | 49 m² | 12,000 € | 246 |
| 21 Oct 2019 | 3 | 49 m² | 12,000 € | 246 |
| 1 Apr 2019 | 1 | 42 m² | 52,000 € | 1,226 |
| 7 Sept 2018 | 2 | 43 m² | 35,000 € | 824 |
| 19 Apr 2018 | 1 | 42 m² | 17,000 € | 401 |
| 22 Jul 2016 | 2 | 43 m² | 28,000 € | 659 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1961
- Energy class
- F
- Flats
- 14
- Living area
- 571 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 160 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1960–1969; 810) have a median of 118 kWh/m² — this one uses 36% more.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Kandavas iela
Kandavas iela 8 (97), Kandavas iela 8 k-1 (10), Kandavas iela 8 k-3 (10), Kandavas iela 8 k-8 (60), Kandavas iela 12 (89)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Kandavas iela 8 k-4 was first used in 1961.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Kandavas iela 8 k-4 has 14 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
160 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1960–1969; 810) have a median of 118 kWh/m² — this one uses 36% more.