Krūmu iela 55
- · Built 1975, 39 flats
Flats at Krūmu iela 55 cost about 750 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (65 m²)
about €49,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 10 sales in this building since 2016. Median over the last 12 months: 582 €/m² (3 sales).
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026 | 8 | 60 m² | 64,000 € | 1,068 |
| 18 Jun 2026 | 2 | 51 m² | 29,500 € | 582 |
| 25 Mar 2026 | 7 | 60 m² | 10,000 € | 168 |
| 12 Oct 2020 | 6 | 60 m² | 18,750 € | 314 |
| 10 Aug 2020 | 2 | 60 m² | 21,000 € | 349 |
| 30 Aug 2019 | 2 | 50 m² | 17,000 € | 340 |
| 24 Apr 2019 | 8 | 60 m² | 15,000 € | 250 |
| 26 Sept 2018 | 6 | 60 m² | 19,500 € | 326 |
| 20 Mar 2017 | 9 | 60 m² | 15,000 € | 252 |
| 29 Sept 2016 | 5 | 60 m² | 9,800 € | 164 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1975
- Energy class
- E
- Flats
- 39
- Living area
- 2,536 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 110 kWh/m² a year (2016 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Liepāja, built 1970–1979; 58) have a median of 63 kWh/m² — this one uses 75% more.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Krūmu iela
Krūmu iela 15 (27), Krūmu iela 18A/20A (42), Krūmu iela 20 (53), Krūmu iela 24A (7), Krūmu iela 32 (82), Krūmu iela 34 (108), Krūmu iela 38 (92), Krūmu iela 40 (76), Krūmu iela 42 (80), Krūmu iela 49 (39), Krūmu iela 51 (38), Krūmu iela 57 (39), Krūmu iela 59 (77)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Krūmu iela 55 was first used in 1975.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Krūmu iela 55 has 39 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
110 kWh/m² a year (2016 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Liepāja, built 1970–1979; 58) have a median of 63 kWh/m² — this one uses 75% more.