Lāčplēša iela 19

  • · Built 1972, 33 flats

Flats at Lāčplēša iela 19 cost about 704 €/m² per m² (November 2026).

What is your flat worth?

€

Average flat (54 m²)

about €38,000

the building's average flat size

Price per m²€704/m² · 634–€741/m² · from 8 comparable listings

Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.

Notary and state duty on selling a €38,000 flat: €641.87 →

© OpenStreetMapGoogle Maps ↗

Follow this building

An email when a flat in this building goes up for sale.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selling a flat at Lāčplēša iela 19? Find an estate agent →

Sale history

The State Land Service has registered 11 sales in this building since 2016.

DateFloorAreaPrice€/m²
17 Mar 2026132 m²15,000 €467
25 Apr 2025332 m²25,000 €772
18 Dec 2024249 m²49,000 €1,002
23 Oct 2023359 m²55,000 €932
25 May 2023151 m²42,000 €825
5 Aug 2022241 m²47,800 €1,160
7 Sept 2021249 m²42,000 €859
24 May 2021241 m²25,000 €607
14 Oct 2020160 m²27,000 €452
7 Jul 2017249 m²25,000 €509
29 Nov 2016151 m²24,500 €481

Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).

Building

Built
1972
Energy class
E
Flats
33
Living area
1,795 m²
Energy use and works done ▾

Energy use: 126 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Jelgava, built 1970–1979; 46) have a median of 86 kWh/m² — this one uses 47% more.

Flats in this building

No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.

    Other buildings on Lāčplēša iela

    Lāčplēša iela 17 (33), Lāčplēša iela 25 (28), Lāčplēša iela 29 (28), Lāčplēša iela 33 (21)

    Frequently asked questions

    When was the building built?

    According to the building register, Lāčplēša iela 19 was first used in 1972.

    How many flats are in the building?

    According to the building register, Lāčplēša iela 19 has 33 flats.

    How much energy does the building use?

    126 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Jelgava, built 1970–1979; 46) have a median of 86 kWh/m² — this one uses 47% more.