Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-1
- · Built 1980, 67 flats
Flats at Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-1 cost about 1,086 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (59 m²)
about €64,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Notary and state duty on selling a €64,000 flat: €1,031.87 →
Selling a flat at Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-1? Find an estate agent →
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 8 sales in this building since 2018.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2022 | 2 | 27 m² | 21,900 € | 808 |
| 26 Oct 2022 | 5 | 51 m² | 14,730 € | 289 |
| 24 Sept 2020 | 5 | 50 m² | 30,000 € | 600 |
| 18 Apr 2019 | 3 | 67 m² | 43,780 € | 652 |
| 22 Feb 2019 | 1 | 27 m² | 24,411 € | 894 |
| 8 Nov 2018 | 5 | 27 m² | 8,000 € | 295 |
| 18 Oct 2018 | 1 | 27 m² | 14,711 € | 539 |
| 10 Jul 2018 | 3 | 27 m² | 15,000 € | 549 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1980
- Energy class
- E
- Flats
- 67
- Living area
- 3,932 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 106 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1980–1989; 736) have a median of 120 kWh/m² — this one uses 12% less.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Martas Rinkas iela
Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-2 (11), Martas Rinkas iela 3 (33), Martas Rinkas iela 4 (50), Martas Rinkas iela 5 (63), Martas Rinkas iela 7 (110), Martas Rinkas iela 9 (57), Martas Rinkas iela 11 (114), Martas Rinkas iela 12 (32)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-1 was first used in 1980.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Martas Rinkas iela 1 k-1 has 67 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
106 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1980–1989; 736) have a median of 120 kWh/m² — this one uses 12% less.