Nometņu iela 33A
- · Built 1870, 5 flats
Flats at Nometņu iela 33A cost about 3,100 €/m² per m² (November 2026).
What is your flat worth?
Average flat (55 m²)
about €171,000
the building's average flat size
Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.
Notary and state duty on selling a €171,000 flat: €2,636.87 →
Sale history
The State Land Service has registered 6 sales in this building since 2016.
| Date | Floor | Area | Price | €/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Jul 2021 | Whole house | 275 m² | 70,000 € | 254 |
| 15 Feb 2020 | 2 | 63 m² | 50,000 € | 790 |
| 8 Nov 2019 | 1 | 87 m² | 150,000 € | 1,716 |
| 31 Oct 2019 | 1 | 71 m² | 26,400 € | 372 |
| 31 Oct 2019 | 2 | 41 m² | 45,500 € | 1,107 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Whole house | 265 m² | 115,000 € | 434 |
Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).
Building
- Built
- 1870
- Energy class
- B
- Flats
- 5
- Living area
- 275 m²
Energy use and works done ▾
Energy use: 57 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1870–1879; 24) have a median of 89 kWh/m² — this one uses 36% less.
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
Other buildings on Nometņu iela
Nometņu iela 3 (25), Nometņu iela 4 (9), Nometņu iela 5 (22), Nometņu iela 7B (6), Nometņu iela 9 (21), Nometņu iela 10 (13), Nometņu iela 12 (26), Nometņu iela 18 k-1 (18), Nometņu iela 20 (15), Nometņu iela 21 (12), Nometņu iela 25A (15), Nometņu iela 32 (56), Nometņu iela 33 (5), Nometņu iela 42 (13), Nometņu iela 48 (3), Nometņu iela 49 (23), Nometņu iela 52 (13), Nometņu iela 57 (14), Nometņu iela 62 (12)
Frequently asked questions
When was the building built?
According to the building register, Nometņu iela 33A was first used in 1870.
How many flats are in the building?
According to the building register, Nometņu iela 33A has 5 flats.
How much energy does the building use?
57 kWh/m² a year (2019 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1870–1879; 24) have a median of 89 kWh/m² — this one uses 36% less.