Parka iela 2

  • · Built 1990, 39 flats

Flats at Parka iela 2 cost about 933 €/m² per m² (November 2026).

What is your flat worth?

€

Average flat (65 m²)

about €61,000

the building's average flat size

Price per m²€933/m² · 852–€1,486/m² · from 5 comparable listings

Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.

Notary and state duty on selling a €61,000 flat: €986.87 →

© OpenStreetMapGoogle Maps ↗

Follow this building

An email when a flat in this building goes up for sale.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selling a flat at Parka iela 2? Find an estate agent →

Sale history

The State Land Service has registered 5 sales in this building since 2021.

DateFloorAreaPrice€/m²
12 Aug 2026564 m²60,000 €935
3 Apr 2025264 m²40,000 €629
7 Nov 2024564 m²70,000 €1,089
26 Apr 2023252 m²50,000 €969
30 Jun 2021564 m²5,000 €78

Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).

Building

Built
1990
Energy class
B
Flats
39
Living area
2,541 m²
Energy use and works done ▾

Energy use: 57 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (all of Latvia, built 1990–1999; 1210) have a median of 93 kWh/m² — this one uses 39% less.

Works on the building

Energy class has improved: E (2018) → B (2023)

per the building register

Flats in this building

No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.

    Other buildings on Parka iela

    Parka iela 4 (80), Parka iela 6 (81), Parka iela 7 (34), Parka iela 10 (88), Parka iela 11 (34), Parka iela 12 (40), Parka iela 13 (83), Parka iela 14 (75), Parka iela 16 (47)

    Frequently asked questions

    When was the building built?

    According to the building register, Parka iela 2 was first used in 1990.

    How many flats are in the building?

    According to the building register, Parka iela 2 has 39 flats.

    How much energy does the building use?

    57 kWh/m² a year (2023 energy certificate). Similar buildings (all of Latvia, built 1990–1999; 1210) have a median of 93 kWh/m² — this one uses 39% less.