Stūres iela 2A

  • · Built 1970, 79 flats

Flats at Stūres iela 2A cost about 1,027 €/m² per m² (November 2026).

What is your flat worth?

€

Average flat (51 m²)

about €53,000

the building's average flat size

Price per m²€1,027/m² · 895–€2,856/m² · from 15 comparable listings

Estimate from asking prices nearby, updated weekly.

Notary and state duty on selling a €53,000 flat: €866.87 →

© OpenStreetMapGoogle Maps ↗

Follow this building

An email when a flat in this building goes up for sale.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selling a flat at Stūres iela 2A? Find an estate agent →

Sale history

The State Land Service has registered 6 sales in this building since 2019.

DateFloorAreaPrice€/m²
21 Jan 2026550 m²54,000 €1,091
6 May 2025350 m²30,000 €605
1 Aug 2024255 m²38,000 €691
5 Jun 2023449 m²21,500 €436
18 Jul 2022550 m²43,000 €869
2 Oct 2019566 m²40,000 €605

Source: State Land Service of Latvia, property transaction prices. Market deals only (from €5,000).

Building

Built
1970
Energy class
A
Flats
79
Living area
4,050 m²
Energy use and works done ▾

Energy use: 40 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1970–1979; 727) have a median of 115 kWh/m² — this one uses 65% less.

Works on the building

Energy class has improved: D (2025) → A (2026)

per the building register

Flats in this building

No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.

    Other buildings on Stūres iela

    Stūres iela 1A (39), Stūres iela 2 (236), Stūres iela 4 (1), Stūres iela 5 (79), Stūres iela 6 (79), Stūres iela 7 (79), Stūres iela 8 (1), Stūres iela 9 (139)

    Frequently asked questions

    When was the building built?

    According to the building register, Stūres iela 2A was first used in 1970.

    How many flats are in the building?

    According to the building register, Stūres iela 2A has 79 flats.

    How much energy does the building use?

    40 kWh/m² a year (2026 energy certificate). Similar buildings (Rīga, built 1970–1979; 727) have a median of 115 kWh/m² — this one uses 65% less.